Posted by: mariannedc | January 23, 2012

Do We Need to Eat?

Economists Question if Agriculture is Important

By Pamela Haines, Quaker social justice educator with a concern for economics and the environment

Some leading economists have asserted that, since agriculture accounts for only 3% of Gross National Product, losing that sector would not have much impact on the overall system. This scenario—an economy whose numbers stays healthy without agriculture, while its people try to manage without food—is a mind-bender.

We bend our minds, struggling to make sense of these things, when the answer is right in front of our faces, too simple to see:  they don’t make any sense.  This way of thinking about economics cannot solve our problems.  We’ll have to wade in among the experts, brush past the thick curtains of numbers, and demand that our economic system be based squarely on the needs of its constituent human beings.

Herman Daly of the University of Maryland’s School of Public Affairs does just that by unmasking the errors in the thinking of economists who argue that no one should worry about climate change impacting agriculture, because agriculture is such a small percentage of our economic output.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: